Trophy Taker
Well-known member
We all know the typical view of our transducer is downward in the shape of a cone. So depending on your transducer view (angle in degrees) and the depth your fishing you get a wider view the deeper you go. This problem is more pronounced in the spring when the fish are usually in shallow water, say for example 10-15 feet deep. Your sonar field of view (cone diameter) in shallow water is relatively small and in essence you don’t see all the fish in the general vicinity of your bait. This phenomenon will often times prematurely cause an angler to relocate to another spot in an effort to “see more fish”. When using sonar with a downward looking only transducer often times trolling anglers see fish and mistakenly assume they are trolling through these fish. Unfortunately logical human interpretation of what we are seeing is actually flawed logic because of the transducer cone angle and the sonar display unit interpretation of the transducer data. Just because we can see our downrigger ball running “through” the fish on the display (pic-1) doesn’t mean we are necessarily running our ball/lure within striking distance of those fish.
If you want to calculate your cone diameter you first need to know what your transducer angle is, this can be found either on your manufactures web site or is sometimes published in the user’s manual. (pic-2)
This is the formula:
1/2 cone angle x 3.14 (which is pi) ÷ 180 = t (which is tangent)
t x depth x 2 = cone diameter in feet.
Say for example I have a 20 degree transducer. 1/2 of 20 degrees is 10 degrees
So I enter 10 into my calculator multiply 10 by 3.14 then divide my answer by 180 this gives me the tangent. In this example = .174
Now let’s say we are trolling in 40 feet of water. I now take .174 multiply it by my depth (40 feet) then multiply that answer by 2. This results in a cone diameter at 40 feet of 13.92 feet.
That isn’t a very wide view all things considered.
Have you ever been trolling and found that one downrigger/rod seems to get more hits than the other? You put the same lure/bait set up on both rods, the same set back yet despite your best efforts you just can’t seem to get a consistent number of hits on both rods. Let me offer this explanation as something to consider. Using the example above of trolling in 40 feet of water it’s highly likely if only one rod is striking that you are actually catching the very outside edge of a school of fish (pic-3).
Remedy: Troll back through the same area but on your next pass move more to the right or left by 14 feet and see if this changes that hit ratio.
If you want to calculate your cone diameter you first need to know what your transducer angle is, this can be found either on your manufactures web site or is sometimes published in the user’s manual. (pic-2)
This is the formula:
1/2 cone angle x 3.14 (which is pi) ÷ 180 = t (which is tangent)
t x depth x 2 = cone diameter in feet.
Say for example I have a 20 degree transducer. 1/2 of 20 degrees is 10 degrees
So I enter 10 into my calculator multiply 10 by 3.14 then divide my answer by 180 this gives me the tangent. In this example = .174
Now let’s say we are trolling in 40 feet of water. I now take .174 multiply it by my depth (40 feet) then multiply that answer by 2. This results in a cone diameter at 40 feet of 13.92 feet.
That isn’t a very wide view all things considered.
Have you ever been trolling and found that one downrigger/rod seems to get more hits than the other? You put the same lure/bait set up on both rods, the same set back yet despite your best efforts you just can’t seem to get a consistent number of hits on both rods. Let me offer this explanation as something to consider. Using the example above of trolling in 40 feet of water it’s highly likely if only one rod is striking that you are actually catching the very outside edge of a school of fish (pic-3).
Remedy: Troll back through the same area but on your next pass move more to the right or left by 14 feet and see if this changes that hit ratio.
Attachments
Last edited: