I was the one that wrote the article in question. Been a member of KFF for sometime, but haven't posted much here as I tend to spend most of my time on WaLakes. I heard from a friend that there was some chatter over here regarding the "article", so I figured I'd check it out and respond. I want to start by saying that these are my methods and reasoning and that this is what works for me. I'm sure that many of you have your own way and may disagree with what I do. If you do disagree, please comment. Nothing is better than a little healthy debate to iron out a systematic approach to what works, what doesn't, and most importantly...why it does or doesn't.
Regarding the flash, DLM nailed it. Tinsel pretty much sums it up. You can find it at almost every tackle/sporting goods store in my area (greater Seattle area). I know Cabela's has a bunch in their fly shop. Sportco/Outdoor Emporium (local sporting goods warehouses) have a decent selection as well. You could probably find similar stuff at a craft store, but I prefer to use products that are more specific to tackle because the finishes are better quality i.e. UV, fine strands etc. Like DLM and the article said, I take no credit for adding flash to my lures. General Zog turned me onto this addition and it has greatly increased my hookups. I experimented with it a ton last season by putting lures with flash and no flash (same lures, bait and dodgers, only difference was the flash). I found that the flashy lures got hit almost twice as much as the lures without flash. There are times where the flash gets hit less, but the MAJORITY of the time, the flash gets bit more.
Regarding DLM's comment on the drag, all I can say is that I don't bother with it. I use Lami white and red koke rods and I absolutely bury the rods as far as they will go without popping the clip. I like my rod tips to be almost in the water. In order to get this much pre-load action, it requires a fairly tight drag. I don't like to have to adjust my drag for each fish, and then re-adjust when loading back in the rigger, so I just leave it TIGHT. I have caught some decent sized kokes (for washington at least) in the 16"-20" range and have yet for any of them to take much line. I let the limber rods and light, stretchy line take care of all the fighing/pulling action. In order to compensate for the tight drag, I use a longer set-back (more on this in a minute). Like the article says, I like to run my lower rods at 80' and my uppers at 100', regardless of depth. Even in Lake Chelan where the fish are commonly 70'-120' deep, I still go with the 80' lower and 100' upper set-backs. I threw the common 100' rule out the window a few years ago.
I believe that the longer set-backs help in multiple ways. First, it gets your offering away from the boat. This helps keep the lure away from the noise of the boat/motor etc and also away from the shadow of the boat. Second, the more line you have out, the more it acts like a rubber band in that it will stretch and contract and give constant pressure on the fish. Third, I feel that the longer you fight the fish while it is down at depth, the better your chances of tiring it out before it gets to the surface. I tend to think that reasons 2 and 3 help me to get away with such a tight drag. Also important is finesse. Take your time and enjoy the fight. There is no rush. Like the article states, I have caught many, many kokes this season, and I have lost very, very few. The article states that I've lost 4, but I'm actually at 6 lost so far this season now (and I remember each and every one like it just happened). Again, 6 out of 200+ fish is merely a drop in the bucket. There are many factors that go into this, but larger drop shot style hooks and long set backs are probably the best things I've done to keep those fish on.
As I stated before, this (and what's in the article) are just a few of the factors that have contributed to much of my success.
So... I'll leave it at that for now, but if anyone wants to chime in with questions, comments or opinions, I'd be happy to respond.